Skip to main content

The Christmas Prism

 So the shelves are emptying.

You'll have seen it at your local supermarket. Gaps, where things used to be. A disruption of the usual service. It's disquieting, as consumers we are, perhaps wrongly, used to abundance, to the availability of all things. This carries echoes of those news reports from the end of the Soviet Union. An intimation that all is not as it normally is. The strange, seemingly arbitrary nature of the disappearances hides, to an extent, their cause. That's weird, this week the mayonnaise is missing, this week the cucumbers. McDonald's has run out of milkshakes. Nando's hasn't got any chicken. Each discrete news story a puzzler.

The story, of course, isn't what's missing, it's that things are.

The reasons are various and  manifold, but they essentially boil down to Brexit. Yes, you might have a little bit of a Covidian fig-leaf covering our national embarrassment, but the brutal reality is that the haulage industry, the seamless transport of goods, had a giant spanner thrown in the works by our dunderheaded act of national self-mutilation, and the results are starting to become visible.

But only just, it's trickles, intimations, signs and portents, a mild symptom belying a nasty dose of something we caught when we were doing something we shouldn't have. The shit, I would imagine, probably won't properly hit the fan until (drumroll, clap of thunder stage left....)

Christmas.

Yes, yes, I know, I'm really sorry. It's still August, the weather is positively balmy and the kids are blanking out the fact that they have to go back to school next week. But I'm afraid that retail and the supply chains entailed therein are well ionto their Christmas planning. I know Hospitality is, I'm nearly booked solid for Christmas eve already, the menus are in the process of being written.

The reason I mention the C word, is that it seems to be the only time that we as a nation take some of our problems seriously. Remember last year, and the Government tying itself in deadly knots with its insistence that everything would be fine?

It's not a spoiler alert to say that it wasn't. And this bizarre insistence on business as usual yuletide-wise lead to a massive wave in January and February, tens of thousands more deaths and another lockdown, which, ironically enough, wiped out Easter and Mother's Day.

Likewise the current shortage of HGV drivers, a bit of a quirk of the news cycle, nothing to see here, until someone mentions the C-word.

And they will, they already are. Marks ands Spencer are reducing their range, a man from Iceland (the shop, not some random from Reykjavik) was on the radio warning about reduced stock over the festive period. And this is true, and it is a problem, but what I wonder is this:

Why are things only ever a problem because they affect Christmas?

The interviewer was only concerned with whether there would be shortages in December. Much as last year all the tabloids cared about was "Boris saving Christmas" (again, not a spoiler alert: he didn't, did probably knock a sizeable bunch off the pension budget though, so there's that). The entire discussion was framed as problems further down the line, threatening the happiness of children and the fucking Coca Cola ad that people seem to like so much.

The HGV driver shortage is a problem right now. I'm getting stock shortages right now, beers disappear, wines are held up in storage for weeks. And if there's one thing I really, really need to spell out, it's this: there's a lot of British produce in the shops at the minute. It's only a few short weeks until there isn't. Oddly enough, we don't grow much stuff all year round. The haulage industry gets more and more vital as Autumn rolls into Winter.

The Government suggests airily that they hire more British drivers, as if HGV drivers aren't incredibly skilled people who take six months plus to train. They relax the working time directive, some of that fabled Brussels red tape, so what few drivers there are can work longer hours, because that's a safe thing to do and in no way insane.

And we roll merrily on. Because, for some reason, on this totally normal island where everything is totally fine we don't take any notice of problems unless they threaten to "Cancel Christmas". Ho ho ho.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...