Skip to main content

Oh local, parochial treats

Been a while since the super, soaraway Ormskirk Champion has served up such a treat, but this one is wonderful.

So anyhow, Marco Pierre White attaches his name to the Swan Inn in Aughton, relaunching it under his aegis. So far so so. Some locals are surprised to learn that he's not cooking there himself, but as they are clearly dolts we shall not allow them to detain us further. Coastalblog is midly intrigued, and will probably toddle along for a spot of dinner in a few months or so, when it's all calmed down a bit.

It then emerges that the parent company (no people, not Marco himself, he is a name attached to said company, do keep up) have applied for planning permission to add some accomodation to said restaurant. You know, the restaurant which is under the aegis of multi award winning, one of the kickers off of the late eighties british food revolution, resolutely top end Marco Pierre White. That restaurant. That restaurant to have some accomodation attached. Lets be absolutely clear about this.

What do you reckon a hotel attached to a restaurant which has the name of a michelin starred, hardcore, quality chef will charge per night? Two hundred quid? Hundred and fifty? Ninety? Ninety sounds about right, I reckon.

No! Cries local heroine Sheryl D, of Aughton. They're going to be charging £19. Nineteen squids to you squire. Well, you might reasonably respond, that sounds highly fucking unlikely, in fact, it sounds suspiciously like you misheard someone saying ninety, and went right off the deep end thus laying yourself wide open to this sort of blog based mockery, but on the off-chance that this is the case, why on earth should I give a monkeys?

Because, says local heroine Sheryl D, a hotel charging £19 a night will (deep breath) "higher the risk of crime" (chew that sentence over for a bit, grammar fans, ask yourself how it got past the Champ's eagle-eyed subs, then ask if they have any subs, then cry bitter tears at the folly of man) "and vandalism" and, oh dear sweet lord "They will be able to watch our daughter playing in the garden". She goes on to say that "As Aughton is in the green belt residents pay a premium to live here"

It's almost impossible to know where to start. It has taken me a couple of days to get round to posting this as my brain is awhirl with the sheer boneheadedness of, well, all of it really. What stands out? Is it that the premise of the whole story is predicated on someone clearly failing to hear a number correctly? Is it that the endlessly quotable Sheryl D can conflate lower prices with increased criminality? Is it being given homilies on morality by someone so patently venal? Is it the fact that Ashley Cole is so soon deposed from the title of World's least self-aware person? Is it the concept of CRIMINALS GOING ON HOLIDAY? "Ere darlin, little weekend break, only £19 a night and we can do some crimes" "ooh, lovely, do they have a teasmade?" Which is, admittedly blowing my mind. Is it the sheer, hateful, petty sentiment? Or is it the fact that a fucking newspaper printed this shit? And nobody thought to check it? I mean it's been a slow news week even by Ormskirk standards, but even so...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...