Skip to main content

Sold

There was a joke doing the rounds during the early part of the Covid crisis. At least, everyone said, we've stopped talking about Brexit. Ha ha.

Then, as the crisis rolled on longer than we'd feared, a few thoughtful souls pointed out that this was no time to be negotiating a trade deal. Perhaps, they said, it might be wise to postpone things a few months. Absolutely not, said the Government. This seemed odd. After all, even the more rabid elements of the Brexiteers saw the sense in this. We all had a lot on our plates.

Nope, said HMG, we're out by the end of the year, come what may. Now, this may strike you as a little odd. They had, after all, spent years harping on about the importance of a deal. The details of said deal had already brought down one Prime Minister, and forced two elections. Insisting that we're out by the end of December brings the dreadful prospect of no deal a lot closer.

Unless, of course, no deal was the goal all along.

Cards on the table, I voted Remain in 2016. I did so for a number of reasons, but chief amongst them is that I didn't want us doing a trade deal with the US; even under Obama, there's no way that we'd get the better end of the deal against an economy as big as theirs. Under the rapacious Trump, it would be even worse. As part of the EU we were part of a bloc with enormous economic heft. As the little old UK, not so much.

But still, I reasoned, after my side lost, a trade deal with the EU would see us protected from the worst excesses of US disaster capitalism. And we were definitely going to sign a trade deal with the EU, our largest trading partner, right?

We're less than six months away from that not happening. Talk have ground to a halt. The EU complains about our negotiator's intransigence, their stubbornness. But is that a deliberate ploy? Is the whole strategy to kick the can so far down the road that no deal is inevitable?

Writing in today's Guardian, George Monbiot makes a persuasive case that this, indeed was the plan all along. And it certainly fits with the rabid "Britannia Unchained" pamphlet co-written by Raab and Patel. We have a Government of ultra-Thatcherites, ideologically driven to shrink the state until there's nothing left. A US trade deal provides the perfect cover for this.

The Government has already U-turned on its promise to uphold animal welfare standards. It's already bent on opening our market up to cheap US imports, farmed in appalling conditions that we would never countenance. There is no reason to imagine that they won't cave to US demands for full access to the NHS. From there on out, it's open season. Government will be subject to rules which allow corporations to sue them if they pass laws that "may affect future profits". In practice, this could be anything. Environmental legislation? We might want to drill for oil there. Safety standards? Too expensive. Worker's right? Are you kidding, that'd cost. Sue 'em.

Since 1980, there has been a steady erosion of consumer rights in the US, as more and more money has been funnelled into corporations and the very wealthiest. It's no co-incidence that one of Trump's first actions was a tax cut for the richest. The school system has been eroded, Social services defunded. America is in a death spiral of falling living standards, where an entire city can be poisoned by polluted water but those at fault are legally protected from prosecution. The eruption of rioting that we've seen over the last few weeks is but one symptom of its deep malaise. And now, the corporations that have overseen this dystopian descent are coming after us.

A touch hyperbolic, perhaps. But this Government has eroded belief in the fundamental power of our parliamentary democracy. They've ridden rough shod over the usual checks and balances of good governance. Last year's illegal prorogation of Parliament being a case in point. They don't want accountability. The extraordinary protection of Dominic Cummings proved that they simply don't care about public opinion. The highest number of deaths in Europe is an "Excellent response". They lie without thinking, and without caring if they're caught. So I have no faith in their ability to defend us from the worst excesses of US disaster capitalism. I suspect that they welcome it.

In 2016 people voted, however misguidedly, to "Take Back Control". And as a result we now stand on the verge of giving all of it, and more, to people who only care about profits. This is not sovereignty, this is vassalage. And in achieving it, Johnson and Co will have gone further than Thatcher ever managed, they will have destroyed the post 1945 settlement, they will have destroyed the state. And they'll tell us that it's what we voted for, all along.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The last day of the county season

 Look, I never claimed to be cool. As a a cliched middle aged male, I have a number of interests which, if not exactly niche, are perhaps not freighted with glamour. Not exactly ones to set the heart racing. I yearn not for wakeboarding, my cocaine with minor celebrities days are well and truly behind me, you are unlikely to catch me writing graffiti under a motorway bridge. I do cycle, but only as a way of getting from point A to point B, you are unlikely, you will be relieved to hear, to see me purchasing lycra and or/doing triathlons. I like going for a nice walk. I'm fond of a good book. I have a deep attachment to county cricket. Yes, that's right, county, not even the international stuff which briefly captures the nation's fleeting attention once in a blue moon. County cricket. Somerset CCC to be precise, though I'll watch / listen to any of it. The unpopular part of an unpopular sport. Well, that's the public perception, the much maligned two men and a dog. N...

D-Day Dos and Don'ts for Dunces

Oh Rishi. Lad.  You have, by now, almost certainly become aware of the Prime Minister(for the time being)'s latest gaffe, as he returned home early from D-Day commemoration events in France, in order to "concentrate on an interview" which, as it turns out was already pre-recorded. There's been a fair bit of outrage, the word "disrespectful" is being bandied about a lot.  The word I'd use is "stupid". It is often said of the Brits that we have no religion but that the NHS is the closest thing we have to one. This, I think, is incorrect, because the fetishisation of WWII is to my mind, far closer to being our object of national veneration.  I understand why, last time we were relevant, fairly straightforwardly evil oppo, quite nice to be the good guys for a change, I absolutely get why the British public worship at the altar of a conflict which, I note, was a very long time ago. I think it's a bit daft, personally, but I understand it. So you...

The three most tedious food debates on the internet.

 I very much only have myself to blame. One of the less heralded aspects of running a business is that one is, regrettably, obliged to maintain a social media presence, it's just expected. And, if I have to do it, I'm going to do it very much in my own voice, as I don't tend to have time to stop and think when I'm bunging something on Insta. It seems to have worked okay so far. But, as a man better versed on the online world than he would prefer, I should have known better than to stick up a picture of our bread rolls, fresh out of the oven. In my defence, I did preface said picture by saying "one of the most tedious debates on the internet is what these are called...". Doubtless you've seen the argument somewhere, it's one of the workaday tropes that shithouse FB pages use to drive engagement. Need a few thousand clicks to raise the profile of your godawful local radio station/page about how everything was better in the past/shelter for confused cats?...