Skip to main content

Booooooo

Exciting new ground being broken in our seemingly forever culture war this week, as HMG got itself into a bit of a semantic tangle defending the rights of racists concerned and politically aware citizens who wish to resist the creep of *checks notes* Marxism? Really? 

No point recapping the history too much, you are doubtless aware that the England team is continuing to take the knee as an anti-racist protest at the start of games, and you are doubtless also aware that a peculiarly racist  politically engaged section of their support has protested this stance, viewing it as deliberately divisive and in itself racist. They argue that BLM is a marxist movement that seeks to defund the police and alter our very way of living, and, as such, the England football team are making themselves stooges of a far-left cult who...

No, sorry, can't keep a straight face.

Right. This is a pretty clear-cut situation. If you're booing an anti-racism gesture, you're a fucking racist. There we have it. Clear? Good.

But not, it seems, if you're a representative of this current clown car of an administration, which can't spy a shitstorm without charging straight into the middle of it. The PM, who enjoys a bit of nudge nudging and wink winking with the old racism has called on people to support the team taking the knee, while at the same time refusing to condemn the racists very well informed and intelligent protestors.

Boz, as you may have gathered, is a man who delights in those around him doing really shitty things while maintaining enough distance that he can pretend it's not entirely to do with him. And so, while he was saying players taking the knee was fine, he was also very carefully not censuring Tory MP Gillian Keegan, who was speaking her brains all over peoples faces at the BBCs notoriously fair and balance bearpit Question Time. Our Gill, hitherto something of a middle ranker, having spotted an opportunity to make a name for herself parped noxiously that taking the knee was "divisive" and (and this is a spectacular bit of doublespeak) that those who boo "would pretty much like to end racism as well."

Drink that in.

In doing so, she's playing carefully to the Tory side of the culture war, as well as keeping the racists on side. Because every racist likes to think of themselves as not-racist-at-all. Indeed, they'll generally be at pains to tell you how many friends they have that are "you know, a bit like that."

This is the regular tactic of stirring things just enough to muddy the waters. No sane person thinks that the England football team are Marxists. They're Premier League footballers, that's about as capitalist as it gets without running a hedge fund which specialises in guns, tobacco and children's tears. At no point has Harry Kane talked about seizing the means of production. Granted, Marcus Rashford has made a habit of making HMG look like compete arses, but I don't believe I've ever seen him singing The Red Flag.

No, the argument is clearly specious, but, what it is is another wedge that can be used to divide people and keep them angry. The Tories are playing a game the aim of which is to keep just enough people angry enough to keep voting for you because you hate and fear the other side. To be fair to them, it's working.

It's been something of a banner few weeks for top sporting racism, as the row over the England cricketer Ollie Robinson's pretty gruesome tweets got Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden, and our own Prime Minister sticking their oar in, too. This was pretty rich in Dowden's case, as he was another decrier of taking the knee, saying that it was "important to keep politics out of sport". Given this, it then came as something of a surprise to hear that he'd appointed himself a de facto selector of the England cricket time, as he criticised the ECB for their suspension of Robinson over tweets that he had made whilst a grown man.

Nobody's perfect, of course, most of us have said things we regret, but they could have done anything but suspend him is beyond me. It was pretty horrible stuff. I'm sure Robinson's a changed man and a better person these days, but you can't just let that sort of thing slide.

Not according to OD and BJ though, both of whom went off at the ECB, saying they'd gone over the top and "it was ten years ago". Neither of them give two shits of course, but if it serves to angry up a few middle aged blokes in swing seats who firmly believe that you can't say anything any more then it's job done. Booooooo,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The last day of the county season

 Look, I never claimed to be cool. As a a cliched middle aged male, I have a number of interests which, if not exactly niche, are perhaps not freighted with glamour. Not exactly ones to set the heart racing. I yearn not for wakeboarding, my cocaine with minor celebrities days are well and truly behind me, you are unlikely to catch me writing graffiti under a motorway bridge. I do cycle, but only as a way of getting from point A to point B, you are unlikely, you will be relieved to hear, to see me purchasing lycra and or/doing triathlons. I like going for a nice walk. I'm fond of a good book. I have a deep attachment to county cricket. Yes, that's right, county, not even the international stuff which briefly captures the nation's fleeting attention once in a blue moon. County cricket. Somerset CCC to be precise, though I'll watch / listen to any of it. The unpopular part of an unpopular sport. Well, that's the public perception, the much maligned two men and a dog. N...

D-Day Dos and Don'ts for Dunces

Oh Rishi. Lad.  You have, by now, almost certainly become aware of the Prime Minister(for the time being)'s latest gaffe, as he returned home early from D-Day commemoration events in France, in order to "concentrate on an interview" which, as it turns out was already pre-recorded. There's been a fair bit of outrage, the word "disrespectful" is being bandied about a lot.  The word I'd use is "stupid". It is often said of the Brits that we have no religion but that the NHS is the closest thing we have to one. This, I think, is incorrect, because the fetishisation of WWII is to my mind, far closer to being our object of national veneration.  I understand why, last time we were relevant, fairly straightforwardly evil oppo, quite nice to be the good guys for a change, I absolutely get why the British public worship at the altar of a conflict which, I note, was a very long time ago. I think it's a bit daft, personally, but I understand it. So you...

The three most tedious food debates on the internet.

 I very much only have myself to blame. One of the less heralded aspects of running a business is that one is, regrettably, obliged to maintain a social media presence, it's just expected. And, if I have to do it, I'm going to do it very much in my own voice, as I don't tend to have time to stop and think when I'm bunging something on Insta. It seems to have worked okay so far. But, as a man better versed on the online world than he would prefer, I should have known better than to stick up a picture of our bread rolls, fresh out of the oven. In my defence, I did preface said picture by saying "one of the most tedious debates on the internet is what these are called...". Doubtless you've seen the argument somewhere, it's one of the workaday tropes that shithouse FB pages use to drive engagement. Need a few thousand clicks to raise the profile of your godawful local radio station/page about how everything was better in the past/shelter for confused cats?...