Skip to main content

Mad Dogs and Immigration Ministers

It is with no small degree of distress that I'm afraid to say I've been thinking about Robert Jenrick.

I know, I know, in this beautiful world with its myriad of wonders, thetre are many other things about which I could think, the play of sunlight upon dappled water, the laughter of my children, the song thrush calling from the sycamore tree a few yards away from where I type this. Yet the shiny, faintly porcine features of the Minister for Immigration keep bubbling up into my consciousness. It's a pain in the arse, I tell you.

A few years ago on here I wrote a piece entitled The cruelty is the point in which I argued that some policies are cruelty simply for the sake of it, pour decourager les autres. I was reminded of that recently when I listened to Jenrick defending his unpleasant, petty decision to order murals at a migrant children's centre to be painted over.

You've probably heard the story already; deeming pictures of cartoon characters "too welcoming" the never-knowingly-underlunched Minister decreed that they be painted over, presumably in a nice bland bureaucratic beige. It's the sort of story that you find faintly unbelievable at first, it's surely too much of a caricature of mean-spiritedness, it's too perfect in its soul-deadening grimness.

Because this isn't just an attack on migrants, it's an attack on children, alone and in weird country where everyone seems to hate them and politicians try to outdo each other with hammed-up hatred, lock 'em in a barracks, no, stick 'em on a barge, no shoot them into the sun. The story seems, at first glance, to be too pat a summation of the pointless cruelty if the last throes of this dying administration. Being a cunt is all they've got left.

It puts me in mind of the fag end of the Major administration, about which if you ask anyone to think about it it they'll shrug before saying "Cones Hotline? Was that them?". The much derided policy was perfectly emblematic of a drifting, rudderless administration which was bereft of ideas. In the same way, Jenrick and Braverman's performative hostility towards migrant children is the perfect summation of the dying embers of this particular stint of Tory mismanagement. A neat little capsule of a story to sum up their bewildering lurch into complete arseholedom.

It's all the more mystifying because this appeals to literally no one beyond a small cadre of weird racists. The Government, and its baying outriders in the less savoury sections of the press, are so spectacularly out of tune with your average punter, who is more concerned with the fact that you can't even get the family shop done in Lidl for under a ton any more. Readers of the Sun, Mail and Telegraph are on the whole, significantly less mad than those increasingly rabid organs. The same probably cannot be said for avid viewers of GB News, whio are, in all likelihood, beyond hope.

The point being that no one, literally no one, thinks painting over cartoons to make an environment more hostile for kids is a good idea. Not even those insane few who still think the Rwanda thing is going to happen. I don't even think Jenrick thinks it's a good idea, I'd be fucking amazed if Sunak did (Braverman might, she's a genuinely nasty piece of work). He just feels compelled to do it because they've painted themselves into a corner whereby the only policy they have left is to punch down, ever harder, and if it means some scared and bewildered kids have a less pleasant place to say, then that's better than some dingbat on Talk TV calling you woke.

The current administration is a dog driven mad by fear, biting at everyone and everything, it knows it's doomed, but it can't fathom it's own destruction. For their own sake, this Government needs to be put out of its misery, before it inflicts yet more on others.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To all intents and purposes, a bloody great weed.

I absolutely love trees, and I get quite irate when they get cut down. One of the aspects of life with which I most often find myself most at odds with my fellow man is that I'm not really a fan of the tidy garden. I like to see a bit of biodiversity knocking about the gaff, and to that end I welcome the somewhat overgrown hedge, am pro the bit of lawn left to run riot, and, most of all, very anti cutting down trees. I love the things, habitat, provider of shade, easy on the eye, home to the songbirds that delight the ear at dawn, the best alarm clock of all. To me, cutting a naturally growing tree down is an act of errant vandalism, as well as monumental entitlement, it's been around longer than you. So, this being the case, let me say this. The public outcry over the felling of the tree at Sycamore Gap is sentimental, overblown nonsense, and the fact that the two men found guilty of it have been given a custodial sentence is completely insane. Prison? For cutting down a Sycam...

Oh! Are you on the jabs?

I have never been a slender man. No one has ever looked at me and thought "oh, he needs feeding up". It's a good job for me that I was already in a relationship by the early noughties as I was never going to carry off the wasted rock star in skinny jeans look. No one has ever mistaken me for Noel Fielding. This is not to say that I'm entirely a corpulent mess. I have, at various times in my life, been in pretty good shape, but it takes a lot of hard work, and a lot of vigilance, particularly in my line of work, where temptation is never far away. Also, I reason, I have only one life to live, so have the cheese, ffs. I have often wondered what it would be like to be effortlessly in good nick, to not have to stop and think how much I really want that pie (quite a lot, obviously, pie is great), but I've long since come to terms with the fact that my default form is "lived-in". I do try to keep things under control, but I also put weight on at the mere menti...

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...