Skip to main content

The downward spiral

It's rare that a shock in the world of Hospitality crosses over to the mainstream news. But with the news emerging yesterday that Le Gavroche is to close, we had one of those moments of a topic which is a something if an obsession in our industry actually becoming public, a very visible symptom of a disease which has been incubating for a fair old while now.

Talk amongst chefs has changed in the last few years, as we've navigated the successive shocks of Brexit and Covid, from who's doing what, who's rolling out, who's going for a star and are they worth it to the simpler questions: who's going under? how are you keeping going?

When the news about Le Gav broke, my sous and I exchanged a look and asked the same question, if Michel Roux can't make it work, what hope for the rest of us?

That wasn't the only closure I heard of yesterday, but it's unlikely you've heard about the other one. About nineish, just as I was ticking off my fish order, a guy arrived with a few sacks of chicken. "Have you heard we're closing?" he said. Johnson and Swarbrick, purveyors of the best quality chicken and duck in the North, and  a supplier of mine for the best part of twenty years. Shutting up shop next week. This was a lot closer to home than a London 3 star.

Over the course of a bit of a chat (for obvious reasons, he wasn't in a rush) it emerged that it wasn't so much rising costs (they've never been shy about passing those on) so much as no one to sell to "never really recovered after covid" he said.

Our industry has had a lot to contend with over the last few years (caveat for the easily irritated: this is not me saying no others have, I can only speak from experience), and the stresses and strains are starting to tell on a lot of folk. First, Brexit and half the staff disappeared, then Covid and you're shut on and off for two years, then everyone works out they can make more money stacking shelves in Lidl, wages rise as a result (nb this is not a bad in thing, industry wages weren't great, and now they're pretty good, but that money has to come from somewhere, think about that the next time you complain about paying over a fiver for a pint), then energy prices go through the roof, food prices and ingredients costs likewise. It's been a fun old tap-dance staying on top of it all.

And now, it appears, it's all coming home to roost a bit. The problems which have been common knowledge in hospo circles for the last few years are starting to be noticed by the wider public.

What are the solutions? Well, there aren't any easy ones, possibly business rates could be looked at (the industry is worth 5% of GDP, yet contributes 15% of rates), the big battle cry amongst industry pros is VAT: at a crippling 20%, that fish and chips you're kicking off at paying 14 quid for, 2.80 is straight to HMRC before you've even paid for the fish (3.25 per unit, up from 1.75 two years ago) and spuds (oh, they're twice as expensive this year cos the weather's been shit - stick climate change on the list will you), let alone staff wages and pension, the energy to cook it, the energy to light the building you're eating it in....the irritating thing about VAT on food is there's nothing to claim back. I pay VAT on a barrel of beer, I have to charge VAT on the pint, but I can at least claim the bit on the barrel back. I buy some lettuce, zero VAT, but put that lettuce on a plate and it suddenly becomes subject to an extra 20% tax. Just like that.

But I appreciate tax needs to be paid, how else is Michelle Mone going to nick it all and buy a new yacht? So I highly doubt that there's going to change any time soon.

Sunak's big idea? Takeaway pints. Cheers. And fuck off, you useless prick.

Nope, there are no easy answers. So all I would say is do support your local pubs and restaurants (not Spoons, they'll be fine). Go for a pint, go for a coffee (no, not in Starbucks, they'll be fine, too), go for a meal if your finances allow. Try not to wince at the price. You'll miss us when we're gone.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...