Skip to main content

Bring me the heads of the book reviewers.

Now, I have no objection to Haruki Murakami, in fact what I've read of his I've liked a great deal, which, as I came to the books determined to dislike them (when approval is so unanimous...come on, you used to be an indie kid, you know what I mean) came as a pleasant surprise. But I nearly didn't read the books at all.

Now, I don't know about you, but when I walk into a bookshop I am in one of two modes. I either know already what I'm looking to buy or I'm browsing. Generally it's the former, our bookshop here tries manfully but factors of space discount the more arcane of my tastes, but on those occasions of the latter then I'm being subconsciously spurred on by a number of things; friend's half-remembered recommendations, aged reviews, my own vague recollections of the author or sometimes just plain curiosity.

The one thing which does not spur me on, which in fact repulses me (as was the case with the Murakami), are the edited higlights of reviews that publishers see fit to plaster otherwise perfectly attractive with. Now, don't get me wrong, I have nothing against book reviews, more than once a favourable notice from a trusted source has propelled me towards something I otherwise wouldn't have picked up. If a book I was planning to buy gets slated however meh, I'll take my chances anyway, thanks. The reviews themselves often make for entertaining reading.

IN THEIR ENTIRETY

The fifteen or so words of gushing hyperbole that the publishers extract, on the other hand make the reviewers sound like excitable simpletons, incapable of any insight beyond the following: "haunting" "wise" "dream-like" "sensual" "poetic". Morons words, words which lay themselves open to ridicule. Hyperbole makes fools of us all, it leaves no room for interpretation. An example from The New York Times

"This wise and beautiful book is full of hidden truths"

How the hell do you know if they're hidden? Unless you, the reviewer, and by implication you, the purchaser and reader are just as wise, able to tease out the meaning. I'm all in favour of engaging with the text, and, by extension, the author, what I object to is being told. What I object to is the publishers shouting at me from the book's back. I'm a reasonably intelligent guy, and call me contrary but I like to make my own mind up about things. So Vintage books, be warned, the next time I see "an intimate, dream-like evocation" I'm torching the fucking shop.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is happening?

An unpleasant, but in the grand scheme of things quite minor, incident occurred at a local school yesterday. Two lads entered the premises looking for another kid they wanted to assault. The school followed protocols and was locked down until the situation was resolved. Grim enough in and of itself, but not exactly a massive piece of news. Except, of course, on local Facebook pages, where a cast of many hang around visibly thirsting for events like this. This isn't a post about them, however. There is something desperately sad about a million posts on the same subject, everyone breathlessly recycling the same story without checking whether it might have already been covered. It speaks to an unfulfilled existence. Nor is this a post about Facebook and it's local pages, though they are a weird and interesting ecosystem. Were it not for running the pub, my Meta presence would be minimal, I need to be on there for work, and stuff like this is a necessary accoutrement. No, what depr...

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Worthless Art

Ah, we're back to calling humanities degrees rip-offs, are we? What a semi regular treat that is. There is a persistent strain of thought in British public life which runs thus: things are shit, blame clever people. When a politician needs a convenient punchbag, higher education is always a quick and easy mark. Everyone hates students, right? And those lecturers, bit up themselves, aren't they? And so Kemi Badenoch, bereft of ideas, takes up the cudgels once more, because why not? It's not like she's got anything else sensible to say. Might as well try and score a few populist points. Cuh, English degrees eh? What use are they?  Yes, this week, the erstwhile leader of His Majesty's Opposition decided to wander down a tired and well-trodden path and try to score a few points off the back of the much maligned Arts and Humanities. She's not the first, I highly doubt she'll be the last. She set out plans to a somewhat sparsely attended Conservative Party Confere...