Skip to main content

Oh! Are you on the jabs?

I have never been a slender man. No one has ever looked at me and thought "oh, he needs feeding up". It's a good job for me that I was already in a relationship by the early noughties as I was never going to carry off the wasted rock star in skinny jeans look. No one has ever mistaken me for Noel Fielding.

This is not to say that I'm entirely a corpulent mess. I have, at various times in my life, been in pretty good shape, but it takes a lot of hard work, and a lot of vigilance, particularly in my line of work, where temptation is never far away. Also, I reason, I have only one life to live, so have the cheese, ffs.

I have often wondered what it would be like to be effortlessly in good nick, to not have to stop and think how much I really want that pie (quite a lot, obviously, pie is great), but I've long since come to terms with the fact that my default form is "lived-in". I do try to keep things under control, but I also put weight on at the mere mention of a danish.

As it happens, I'm currently in one of my shrinking periods, where work is stable enough for me to actually keep an eye on what I'm eating, I'm not rushing around covering everybody else's shifts and I'm able to make time to train properly. I assume there must be some sort of visible difference because someone asked me if I was "on the jabs".

I am not. Not for any ethical reason, more for practical ones. They're expensive, and you have to stay on them, or you'll just put it back on again. Nah. Not for me, thanks, I'm already married, and I've got three kids, that's quite enough in the way of lifelong commitments.

This is in no way a criticism of people who are. You do you. There's a lot of snobbishness surrounding use of weight loss drugs, some sort of puritanism that holds that unless the weight loss is accompanied by spectacular self denial and a punishing exercise regimen, then it is somehow cheating, somehow lesser.

This is, if course, bollocks. I've been fat, and I've been possessed of a physique that drew compliments. Option two is nicer, it's just not terribly practical. If people's desire to lose weight is such that they're happy to submit themselves to the drugs regularly, I have no problem with that.

What I do have a problem with is that if you do lose weight the old fashioned way, people's first thought is "ah, Ozempic". No, watching what I eat, and a lot of running. But this in itself is at odds with me not minding how folk get the weight off, it doesn't matter, but it grates.

Ah, Coastalblog, it's better than therapy this. So I suppose what I'm saying is I'm anxious that people should know I'm doing it the hard way, so they think better of me, needy little praise hound that I am, proper Beggy Mitchell. But really, it doesn't bloody matter. Jabs or no jabs, so long as you're reasonably at peace with yourself eh? 

And on that homespun homily, I'm off for a pint. Own worst enemy, me.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is happening?

An unpleasant, but in the grand scheme of things quite minor, incident occurred at a local school yesterday. Two lads entered the premises looking for another kid they wanted to assault. The school followed protocols and was locked down until the situation was resolved. Grim enough in and of itself, but not exactly a massive piece of news. Except, of course, on local Facebook pages, where a cast of many hang around visibly thirsting for events like this. This isn't a post about them, however. There is something desperately sad about a million posts on the same subject, everyone breathlessly recycling the same story without checking whether it might have already been covered. It speaks to an unfulfilled existence. Nor is this a post about Facebook and it's local pages, though they are a weird and interesting ecosystem. Were it not for running the pub, my Meta presence would be minimal, I need to be on there for work, and stuff like this is a necessary accoutrement. No, what depr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...
Post a Comment
Read more

Worthless Art

Ah, we're back to calling humanities degrees rip-offs, are we? What a semi regular treat that is. There is a persistent strain of thought in British public life which runs thus: things are shit, blame clever people. When a politician needs a convenient punchbag, higher education is always a quick and easy mark. Everyone hates students, right? And those lecturers, bit up themselves, aren't they? And so Kemi Badenoch, bereft of ideas, takes up the cudgels once more, because why not? It's not like she's got anything else sensible to say. Might as well try and score a few populist points. Cuh, English degrees eh? What use are they?  Yes, this week, the erstwhile leader of His Majesty's Opposition decided to wander down a tired and well-trodden path and try to score a few points off the back of the much maligned Arts and Humanities. She's not the first, I highly doubt she'll be the last. She set out plans to a somewhat sparsely attended Conservative Party Confere...
1 comment
Read more