Skip to main content

Book #10: Neverwhere, Neil Gaiman

A brief bit of backstory, as a fairly lonely, reasonably odd and resolutely outsiderish boy, my absolute favourite author in the whole wide world was Terry Pratchett. But my favourite Terry Pratchett book wasn't solely written by him. Good Omens, co-authored with Neil Gaiman, struck precisely at the absurdist but dark sweet spot which was guaranteed to satisfy me. The shade that Gaiman brought to Pratchett's flights of fancy tempered the book to what was, to my mind perfection.

Since then Gaiman's been a figure that's been lurking around the "must get round to reading" parts of my hind-brain. An engaging presence on Twitter, I've been dimly aware that he's been racking up a serious count of books, So when I found myself one sunny morning in Southport's fabulous Broadhurst Books (it's the bookshop of your childhood dreams, tiny rooms, twisting stairs and corridors, walls packed floor to ceiling) it seemed to be the right time (I was looking for some Borges, but it was at such a height that I feared for the safety of the assistant if she went to get it).

And it was....okay. Alright. Quite enjoyable.

I think it's entirely possible that Neverwhere has suffered from a bit too long of a subconscious build-up. I've seen so much love poured out by Gaiman fans that I was expecting my socks to be blown off. As it was, they remained resolutely on. The story concerns a young man being inducted to the fantastic world of London Below. A place invisible to those who live above ground, but populated by characters and creatures whose names have resonance with the quotidian London (Old Bailey, for example, or The Angel Islington). It's a nice conceit, and highlight's Gaiman's excellent ability to mix fantasy with the real world which I fell I love with inGood Omens all those years ago. And it's certainly an entertaining page turner, with some memorable characters (the assassins Mr Croup and Mr Vandemar are worth the price of admission alone). But it left me feeling a trifle unfulfilled. It seems strange to say it, in a book containing some spectacularly gruesome deaths, but I was expecting something a little darker. At no point in Neverwhere did I feel anything other than it was all going to work out for the best.

This is partially a fault of the book's construction, written originally as a TV series, it's been reverse engineered into novel form, and the seams show at times. The book feels episodic, more a series of set pieces, this is the bit of peril in this chapter. this doesn't leave a lot of room for sketching out the characters, and they can, at times verge on the caricature (a exception here is the death and rebirth of the Marquis de Carabas, one of the few moments of what feels like real pain ad suffering in the book). For example, there's surely an interesting backstory to Hunter's quest within a quest, but it's rather cursorily dealt with in a couple of pages, without much detail.


The problem here is that Gaiman is actually slightly too good at his job, he's created this extraordinary world which the reader would like to explore more fully, but without more detailed characters it's difficult to do so. That said, the book is an enjoyable read, and rips along at a fair old pace. But I think, on balance, I needed a little more light I order to deepen the shade.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...