Skip to main content

A complete bust

 It comes to something when you're being trolled by Barry Manilow.*

A question from the BBCs Jon Sopel at yesterday's White House press briefing aroused the derision of the diminutive 70s lounge singer, who was then moved to describe the entire country as "embarrassing". This, bear in mind, from a man who brought the world "Copacabana."

And while I yield to no man in my admiration for Manilow's up-tempo Latin stylings, it came as a bit of a shock to realise that he possesses an instinctive analysis of the geopolitical power shift which occurred when Joe Biden moved into the White House, and the bust of Winston Churchill had moved out.

Sopel, for the record, asked the question about its removal with his tongue fairly firmly in his cheek, but, as with Liam Byrne's much-lamented note about there being no money left, it's probably a joke that was better left un-made.

Because there are a surprisingly large number of people in the upper echelons of British right-wing thought who take this sort of thing very seriously indeed. The cult of Churchill is a subject probably worthy of a blog in its own right, but suffice to say, the eviction of St Winnie (for a bust of Cesar Chavez, no less) is, in the eyes of a certain sort of angry Englishman (and they are always English, and always men) a mortal insult which bears witness to US-UK relations being in the deep freeze now the man memorably insulted by Nigella Lawson as a "bitter orange tart" has exited stage left.

This is, needless to say, froth. I'm only writing about it because I'm a bit bored and I've half an hour to spare. How Joe Biden chooses to decorate his office is a matter of less import to me than pretty much every other topic on the face of the Earth. Apart from motor sport. But, predictably, the permanently outraged battalions of the more troglodytic branches of the British press weren't about to let this particular teacup pass by without causing a storm in it.

Churchill's likeness in bronze has previous here. It was Obama's removal of it which provoked Boris Johnson's notorious remarks about him being "part-Kenyan", a slur which the Biden camp has made clear they haven't forgotten. When Trump moved it back in, the Churchill cult celebrated this as proof that the right sort of chap was back in the White House, the British right generally being more comfortable with rapacious profiteers than they are with black people.

Trump's defenestration, on the other hand, has set them all of a quiver. Biden, they know, will be far more difficult to deal with. Trump merely ignored us, Biden will work constructively with the EU, for a tiny island caught between two of the world's largest power blocs, that is an uncomfortable situation.  Particularly when your Prime Minister went out of his way to insult his mate. Biden has also made it clear that he regards Irishness as part of his heritage, and we all know that the 70s UK boarding houses had signs that said "No blacks, no dogs, no Irish." The Telegraph opined hopefully that his Irish heritage might lead him to look more kindly on the UK, proof that nobody at that paper has ever so much as glanced at a history book.

In short, they're fretting a bit. The Farages and Rees-Moggs, the Goves and the Raabs. I doubt Johnson's fretting, he'll be breezily imagining that all he has to do is have a chat to the chap and he'll soon see what a jolly good sort he is. But those with a scintilla more self awareness are spooked, to the extent that even the removal of a bust can induce an attack of the vapours.

Seriously, what is it with Tories and statues? Honest Bob Jenrick's been all over the place declaring war on "the woke mob" who want to "tear down our heritage", a natty bit of misdirection which allows him to present himself as the defender of all that's noble about Merrie England while not actually having to do anything (your reminder that total number of statues torn down so far by the "woke mob" stands at 1 (one), and that was put back up in a museum). I do find myself wondering where Jenrick's fearless defence of "our history" was when the decision to take down the statue of Jimmy Savile was taken, presumably heritage only applies to historical rapists.

So when Manilow characterised the question as "tragic", he was pretty much bang on the money. No confident country would give two hoots, in the same way as the person who's over their ex doesn't obsessively trawl their social media. This benighted plague island, though, that's just shot itself in the foot and is dimly becoming aware that that was a bad idea? Well, maybe we're not quite so confident as our Government's trying to sound.


*It was actually a chap called Barry Malone, but that doesn't really work for the purposes of the joke, still, transparency and all that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Free School Meals Own Goal

As you're doubtless aware, HMG scored a fairly spectacular own-goal this week, with the decision not to extend free school meals (FSM) over the half-term holiday. The idea, advanced to tremendous effect by Marcus Rashford, was to ensure that no children go hungry when they're not in school. No one could argue with that, right? If we can all agree on one thing, it's that we're pretty anti-starving kids, right? And at a cost of a mere 20 million quid, which is chump change to a government which has wasted billions on Track and Trace that doesn't work, and hundreds of millions in contracts to their mates for PPE that doesn't work, it was a pretty cheap bit of good publicity. Well, as it turns out, there's a sizable element of the Tory party (and the wider populace, we'll get to them in a minute) which is pretty pro-starving kids. You may have seen the speech by Brendan Clarke-Smith, the Conservative member for Bassetlaw, in which he spoke about not wanting

Just let us enjoy it for five minutes, yeah?

He lost! The moment that most sane humans have been fervently praying for for the last four years has finally arrived. After an interminable period of watching numbers fail to move, more "Key Race alerts than I've had hot dinners, and much marvelling at the seemingly iron constitutions of all at CNN, the news was finally confirmed. And lo there was much rejoicing across the land. You'll have your own favourite bit, no doubt, Personally for me it's a toss-up between Nigel Farage losing a ten grand bet and the hilariously shambolic, bathetic ending, where a confused Rudy Giuliani, thinking he'd booked the Four Seasons Hotel for a press conference, stood blinking in the car-park of Four Seasons Total Landscaping, between a crematorium and a shop selling dildoes.  I am not by any stretch much of a US politics nerd. I know that most UK politics fans have a slightly dorky obsession over the US process which probably stems from watching too much West Wing , but it's s

Exceptionalism

In among the various examples of David Cameron being a pillock in her hugely entertaining diaries , which caused a minor furore a few weeks back, the otherwise spectacularly un self-aware Sasha Swire made one hugely telling and perceptive point, described here in Rachel Cooke's excellent Guardian  interview  Following a Downing Street Christmas party in 2011, for instance, she notes that the closeness of Cameron’s circle is “unprecedented… a very particular, narrow tribe of Britain and their hangers-on”. It’s “enough to repulse the ordinary man" This sense of Government by chumocracy was one of the less edifying aspects of the already pretty ropy Cameron years. An idea of a few good pals lording it up at each other's houses and doing a spot of Governing when it suited them haunted the back of a fag packet policies of that intellectually threadbare period (in the book, Dave boasts of "winning a war" in Libya, conflating it with the great day he's just had on t