Skip to main content

An idea of England

 There is an idea, much beloved if a certain type of politician, that you can get away with any old cobblers if you wrap it in a flag.

This week, seeking to jostle his way clear of the roiling mass of mediocrity that is the Conservative Party leadership contest, it is previously fond-of-a-pie, now 24hr-Ozempic-guzzler Honest Bob Jenrick who's been trying his hand at a bit if the old racism.

Bob has forn for this, of course  You will recall his performative cruelty when he ordered cartoon murals for children at migrant detention centres painted over. You will furthermore recall his most recent thought being loudly thunk that saying "Gid is Great" should, um, be a criminal offence. In case we hadn't already established this, the man's an arse.

He's now making a bid for the sclerotic hearts and gin-soaked minds of what's left of the Conservative Party by claiming that "English identity is being erased", the unspoken subtext, of course, being that English = white.

I'm not going to waste time decrying this tack. The Tories are fighting a war which has long since been lost, he's just trying to appeal to an incredibly narrow demographic. The wrongness and crude tastelessness of Jenrick's tactics are not in question.

What I'm more amused by is his inability to define what English identity actually is. There's a reason for this, indeed, there're about 55.98 million reasons. The main one being, ask any of the English and each of them will give you a different answer.

Whenever they're asked to define what "Englishness" is, Tories inevitably retreat to some ersatz 1950s pastiche. Good manners, John Major's spinsters cycling to evensong, warm beer, cricket. Which is utterly bizarre, because nobody lives like this. Questioned about it on Sky news Jenrick, with his face like a kid that hides behind the most feared bully in the Upper Fifth burbled some nonsense about courtesy. Which rather implies that the Welsh, Scots and Northern Irish, um, aren't courteous? Which is not a hill I'd particularly like to die on were I planning to be Prime Minister.

For myself, I'd say the most English thing of all is to shake ones head pityingly at people trying to define notions of nationality. We've never been particularly nationalistic, because we've never needed to be. I don't find flag waving as distasteful as some do, but I do find it bemusing, as in my version of England it's something that's Not Done. Fervent displays of patriotism are the preserve of, well, one doesn't like to cast aspersions....(nothing more English than the catty aside).

The English constitute about 85% of the UK as a whole. As such, I'd argue, we've never really needed to differentiate ourselves from GB. I absolutely get why the other Home Nations do, self determination becomes more important when you're in the shadow of someone bigger.

And, as such, I wonder if this sudden outbreak of nationalistic fervour is a reaction to our increasing irrelevance post Brexit. I don't recall much soul-searching about "English Identity" prior to that  Possibly the close-run thing of the Scottish independence referendum focused a few English minds, too. England post the Union would be forced to redefine itself as something other than the biggest, richest part of Great Britain, we'd need to work out who we are, what we're for.

As to who or what that is, I don't know. But I'm very confident that we don't want to to be defined by Robert fucking Jenrick.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...