Skip to main content

Blue Sky Thinking

Not to make this sound like some portentous announcement, like a celebrity couple imagining that the wider world gives a fig for their marital status, but I have consciously uncoupled from Twitter.

It's been on the cards for a while. Ever since the world's strangest man, Elon Musk, bought it in what was the Worst Banking Decision since 2008, the entire place has been on the slide, his model of buying blue ticks and monetising clicks meaning that the most extreme, the most controversial voices were aggressively promoted, and normal discourse was largely drowned.

I'd watched in dismay as my feed grew ever more right wing, obsessed with small boats and trans issues, race and gender, and it seemed that no matter how carefully I blocked and curated, more screeching, permanently enraged right wingers were placed in front of me.

As a strategy for driving engagement, it's superficially clever. The instinct is to engage, to argue and refute, even the reasonable people I followed were quote-tweeting these morons, all "look what this arsehole is saying". The bile spread exponentially.

But, like all superficially clever ideas, it was profoundly stupid, because eventually most people go "fuck this" and decide it's not worth their time.

For me, that point came at the time of the riots, post the awful events in Southport. As a resident of Ormskirk, just down the road, it's difficult to actually convey the disgust felt locally that this horrific event was jumped on by a mix of lumpen white supremacists and coked up arseholes who were just along for the aggro, and Twitter played a huge part in fanning the flames. I couldn't in good conscience stay, my account's been silent since (I do still have it, hoping against hope for better days ahead, but, as Mrs Coastalblog regularly tuts, I do tend to hang on to things that have outlived their usefulness), particularly as Musk appeared to now be using the sight as a megaphone for his own increasingly deranged, conspiracist views.

I'd opened a Bluesky account when he first bought it, so I wandered over there, and I have to say, it's pretty great. It feels a bit more niche, a bit like the twitter of old, and it's refreshing to go onto socials and be intrigued, rather than enraged, I've rediscovered the joys of nuance, and the joy of posting something without a load of replies calling you a "Jew-lover cuck" or whatever it is those weirdoes trying to fight the culture wars are currently obsessed by.

It has its drawbacks, it ain't Twitter in terms of reach, and I do miss a lot of people I used to follow/was followed by, and it doesn't have that sense of "the news is breaking here" which is why twitter was such catnips for current affairs junkies back in the day. But it's a lot more peaceful, so I think I'm going to hang out there for a bit. If you wish to find me, I have a fairly easily searchable name, see you in a bit maybe.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

To all intents and purposes, a bloody great weed.

I absolutely love trees, and I get quite irate when they get cut down. One of the aspects of life with which I most often find myself most at odds with my fellow man is that I'm not really a fan of the tidy garden. I like to see a bit of biodiversity knocking about the gaff, and to that end I welcome the somewhat overgrown hedge, am pro the bit of lawn left to run riot, and, most of all, very anti cutting down trees. I love the things, habitat, provider of shade, easy on the eye, home to the songbirds that delight the ear at dawn, the best alarm clock of all. To me, cutting a naturally growing tree down is an act of errant vandalism, as well as monumental entitlement, it's been around longer than you. So, this being the case, let me say this. The public outcry over the felling of the tree at Sycamore Gap is sentimental, overblown nonsense, and the fact that the two men found guilty of it have been given a custodial sentence is completely insane. Prison? For cutting down a Sycam...

What is happening?

An unpleasant, but in the grand scheme of things quite minor, incident occurred at a local school yesterday. Two lads entered the premises looking for another kid they wanted to assault. The school followed protocols and was locked down until the situation was resolved. Grim enough in and of itself, but not exactly a massive piece of news. Except, of course, on local Facebook pages, where a cast of many hang around visibly thirsting for events like this. This isn't a post about them, however. There is something desperately sad about a million posts on the same subject, everyone breathlessly recycling the same story without checking whether it might have already been covered. It speaks to an unfulfilled existence. Nor is this a post about Facebook and it's local pages, though they are a weird and interesting ecosystem. Were it not for running the pub, my Meta presence would be minimal, I need to be on there for work, and stuff like this is a necessary accoutrement. No, what depr...