Skip to main content

Worthless Art

Ah, we're back to calling humanities degrees rip-offs, are we? What a semi regular treat that is.

There is a persistent strain of thought in British public life which runs thus: things are shit, blame clever people. When a politician needs a convenient punchbag, higher education is always a quick and easy mark. Everyone hates students, right? And those lecturers, bit up themselves, aren't they?

And so Kemi Badenoch, bereft of ideas, takes up the cudgels once more, because why not? It's not like she's got anything else sensible to say. Might as well try and score a few populist points. Cuh, English degrees eh? What use are they? 

Yes, this week, the erstwhile leader of His Majesty's Opposition decided to wander down a tired and well-trodden path and try to score a few points off the back of the much maligned Arts and Humanities. She's not the first, I highly doubt she'll be the last. She set out plans to a somewhat sparsely attended Conservative Party Conference to divert funding from degrees to apprenticeships. Not necessarily a dreadful idea in and of itself, but the language used was both telling and depressing.

Degrees in the humanities are "poor value" while apprenticeships are "worthwhile". This reduction of higher education into pure monetary value is the sort of philistinism that is very much in tune with the spirit of the age, after all, why learn to draw when you can get  Chat GPT to do it for you? But it is still exrmtremely short-sighted and reductive.

I'm not about to recite the well worn statistics of how valuable the creative industries are to the UK economy, you're an intelligent person, you're already well aware of that. You know that the economic arguments don't stack up, because you also know that it's not about that.

It's about sticking it to artsy-fartsy liberal types, telling them that next to thrusting, go getting industries full of jacked tech bros, the consolations of art are worthless, they are worthless, and that'll teach them for not voting Conservative.

It's all largely pointless display anyway, as Kemi will undoubtedly be handed the revolver and the glass of whisky before too much longer, so dismal is the Tory death spiral, but in its re-treading of such a tired path it's a salutary reminder that one of the great fault lines in society, like red v blue, town v country, Remain v Leave, is, as Neil Hannon once memorably out ot "elegance against ignorance, difference against indifference, wit against shit".

And as AI, trained as it is on the free consumption of great art, and unsustainable without it as fuel, threatens to overwhelm the creative industries with eh, that'll do slop, I think I'll stick with human creativity a while yet. Maybe it's pointless, maybe the tech bros and their glassy-eyed political cheerleaders are right, but it's not a side I want to be on. Give me difference and wit, any day of the week.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

The daftest complaint I ever had

I have written here several times down the years about customer complaints, both justified and idiotic. Working in hospitality they are an ineivitability. No matter how good you are, how consistent, you will get complaints. Very few of them stick in the memory, but some, by virtue of their extreme idiocy, do. And one popped into my mind as I was plating up a dish this lunchtime, and I thought, why not, it's as good a thing to write a blog about as any. It's also an entertaining example of how events can play out in ways you may not expect at the time. It sticks in the mind as it combined stupidity with a petty malice and venality which leaves me with no qualms about taking the piss out of it publicly. I rarely let bad reviews lie, if I feel they're unfair I might demur, if I feel they're reasonable I'll make a point of apologising. If they're stupid I'll take pleasure in replying very politely. This one got ignored. It happened on a Sunday, which is another ...