Skip to main content

Get the message

Some of you may recall that quite a long time ago I blogged about a Lincolnshire schoolboy, Alan Penell, who was imprisoned for stabbing a schoolmate to death with a lock knife. What he did, I argued, was reprehensible but not all that surprising. For a small group of people school is unmitigating hell, a weird place with shifting, indefinable rule-sets where the unfortunate can find themselves ostracised and humiliated to the point of absolute desperation. The only surprise is that this sort of thing doesn't happen more often.

Guess what?. The ineivitability of this is as depressing as the actuality, and the root of the problem lies in the parent's response. "The bullying was blown completely out of proportion." Yeah, maybe to you it was, maybe to all his contemporaries who took such delight in it it was just a bit of fun, but to Tommy Kimpton it was a constant source of misery, a prison from which he saw no form of release.

I'm not being an apologist for his actions, any attack of this nature is reprehensible and unjustifiable, obviously. All I'm saying is it isn't surprising; and that for as long teachers and parents fail to recognise that what appears harmless to them (and to most "normal, well-adjusted people" i.e. those who never went through this sort of shit) terrorises and damages a particular type of individual to the point that they see no other way out this sort of thing is going to happen again and again.

On a slightly happier note, Blair's Commons defeat raises a couple of interesting questions. Surely voting against a bill which one would consider to be entirely within their remit is as ruinous to the Conservative's credibility as Blair's defeat is to his (it was telling, I thought that Michael Mates, Anne Widdecombe and Fatty Soames numbered amongst the abstentions). Also interesting was the number of ex-cabinet ministers amongst the Labour rebels, including a fair few who happily went along with some of Blair's more entertaining excesses whilst they were in office (Michael Meacher, Frank Dobson, Gwyneth Dunwoody, and most hilariously of all, Clare "Bomber" Short).

So, voting with your principles or voting with expediency and revenge? I'm no fan of the 90 day rule, but I'm even less of a fan on the way the Hose of Commons has conducted itself in this matter.

So congratulations to Sir Peter Tapsell, the only Conservative to vote for the Bill.
And congratulations to the Labour rebels who have consistently opposed the Bill, not just when they thought they stood a chance of giving Blair a black eye. Ormskirk's very own Rosie whatserface was a good little Blairite and toed the party line, but at least she's been consistent in doing so, so well done to her also. The whole thing stinks to high heaven

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

The daftest complaint I ever had

I have written here several times down the years about customer complaints, both justified and idiotic. Working in hospitality they are an ineivitability. No matter how good you are, how consistent, you will get complaints. Very few of them stick in the memory, but some, by virtue of their extreme idiocy, do. And one popped into my mind as I was plating up a dish this lunchtime, and I thought, why not, it's as good a thing to write a blog about as any. It's also an entertaining example of how events can play out in ways you may not expect at the time. It sticks in the mind as it combined stupidity with a petty malice and venality which leaves me with no qualms about taking the piss out of it publicly. I rarely let bad reviews lie, if I feel they're unfair I might demur, if I feel they're reasonable I'll make a point of apologising. If they're stupid I'll take pleasure in replying very politely. This one got ignored. It happened on a Sunday, which is another ...