Skip to main content

Good student, bad student

I'm rather taking to this teaching malarkey. I have (as of this morning) just finished my first pile of marking. Now, at first this was a strange experience. Despite having been offered the job, despite all the assurances that I was competent enough for it I found the experience of being the man sitting in judgement on a pile of other people's work somewhat daunting, what with the obvious questions of who am I to judge them etc leaping merrily to the fore. This sensation lasted approximately ten minutes.

You see, whilst I was very proud of my students creative efforts, indeed there was some breathtakingly impressive creative work the supplementary discourses (self-assessment, annotated bibliogaphy) were, with a couple of honourable exceptions, woeful.

I'm making no great claims for myself here, but I am at the very least capable of constructing a reasonably cogent sentence. Repeatedly I was forced to ask myself the question, how the hell did you make it through to third year without even an adequate grasp of how to lay out paragraphs? Sloppy phrasing, inadequate spelling and, worst of all, a wide-ranging failure to question themselves on even the most basic level (to clarify, the self-assessments generally ran to "I wrote this poem I think it's good" with no explanation of why, let alone wondering whether or not it might not be). At a couple of points I was forced to underline sentences and comment that they actually made no sense at all ("for and of the yet", anybody?). Depressing, overall, and I worked myself into a rage wherein I probably marked a lttle too harshly.

It's worth stating again that the poems themselves were, by and large, great, I'm having to stop myself being too negative. But at the risk of sounding like a gout-ridden retired colonel residing in a converted oast-house somewhere in Kent, what on earth are they teaching them in school these days (The ever-reasonable Mrs Coastaltown has a lucid response to this which, once I've negotiated the climb down from my high horse, I'll address)?

So anyway. Bad students.

Then, on my break I wandered over to the shop to buy a bottle of water. In the process of this I encountered two of my first years, one of whom had missed the previous workshop. "Hello Spagnoguland (Not his real name)!" I hailed him "So what's with you not turning up last week then?" He grinned tightly, and said nothing. I was nonplussed. Then he vigorously beckoned his compadre across, at which point the hair-bedecked Bloke Out of XTC (Again, not his real name) explained wearliy that Spagnoguland had "given up speaking for Lent." A novel excuse, and one which I can only applaud for its inventiveness. Good student.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...