Skip to main content

Book 13: Awaydays, Kevin Sampson

Disastrously behind schedule (though that rather depends on your definition of what constitutes a disaster) I scoured the shelves of the local charity shops for a slim volume I could whip through in next to no time. Confronted by a sea of Tom Clancy and Maeve Binchy I wandered home, dispirited. I had, of course, forgotten the first rule of those who hoard book: there's always a tonne of stuff at home you haven't actually got round to reading yet.

And that was the case with this nasty but exhilarating little volume. An account of the bad old days of football hooliganism it features our protagonist, Paul Carty, a nice enough young man from a decent family whose less pleasant weekend hobby is going away with the Pack, Tranmere Rovers' organised firm of hooligans, and smashing the living bejaysus out of some poor provincial town centre.

The book opens with violence, and is punctuated by accounts of fights in various beknighted spots in the lower reaches of the Football League. These set pieces are all described with a degree of relish which can leave the reader with the vague sense of being a middle class tourist in someone else's milieu. Speaking as someone who had to run like hell from tooled-up Arsenal fans in the eighties, I don't have any rose-tinted hooligan memories, aggro's never really been my thing. But Sampson's razor's edge description do tap into something which I do remember, which is the young man's urge to destroy. In most cases it leads to self-destructive behaviour, here, Carty turns his angst outwards, as the fans of Shrewsbury and Chester can attest.

However, this wouldn't be much cop if it were just a book about an angry young man getting in a series of rucks. Awaydays is far cleverer than that. Carty is an interloper in The Pack's world, with his nice job and loving family. He hides his origins from his more authentically working class compadres. This is as much a book about the desire to fit in, about making yourself into something you're not. I remember as a very bookish boy one day making the momentous decision to go and sit at the hard kids' table as if it were the most natural thing in the world. I wished to be something other than what I was. They were surprised, warily accepting, and left me alone for the rest of the school year. But I could never join in their shoeing of other unfortunates. Carty, on the other hand, positively relishes it, losing himself in the violence. We are left to infer that this is something to do with the recent death of his mother, but it is also very much the desire to belong, to be part of the gang.

But it can't last. In between awaydays with The Pack, he works diligently at his job, and indulges in a frankly staggering amount of shagging. But his interests, his taste in music, in clothes, his erudition, all mark him out as something other. His final rejection is as inevitable as it is necessary.

It's a fascinating book in its evocation of time and place. By the time I'd moved to Ormskirk, Liverpool's regeneration was well under way, but there was enough eighties bleakness left that this book rings true to me. Post uni, when I continued the theme of not fitting in by working variously on building sites and as a bailiff in the nastier ends of the city, I met the cast of this book. I worked with guys who'd talk passionately of their love for Echo and the Bunnymen, before turning round and screaming racist slurs at someone walking past the scaffold. Men who lived for Saturday afternoons, fucking and fighting. I'd have a drink with them, I'd laugh at (some of) their jokes. They'd laugh at (some of) mine. I got called a cunt a lot. I threw a few insults back myself, but I was only ever a tourist, there was always academia to go back to (I recall fondly going straight off site to give a poetry reading, still in roofer's gear, jeans covered in dust). Carty's otherness in this book is very much that of the young man trying to lose himself, and failing, and as a depiction of that alone this is an excellent read.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Inedible

"He says it's inedible" said my front of house manager, as she laid the half-eaten fish and chips in front of me, and instantly I relaxed.  Clearly, I observed, it was edible to some degree. I comped it, because I can't be arsed arguing the toss, and I want to make my front of house's lives as simple as possible. The haddock had been delivered that morning. The fryers had been cleaned that morning. The batter had been made that morning (and it's very good batter, ask me nicely and I'll give you the recipe some time). The fish and chips was identical to the other 27 portions I'd sent out on that lunch service, all of which had come back more or less hoovered up, we have have a (justified, if I do say so myself) very good reputation for our chips. But it was, apparently, "inedible". When it comes to complaints, less is more. If you use a hyperbolic word like that, I'll switch off, you've marked yourself as a rube, a chump, I'm not g...

Chop chop

I was completely ignorant of the fuss over the edited Trump speech in an edition of Panorama until, one moment later, I wasn't. And the reasons for my ignorance are instructive. I had no idea that the story was even brewing until the surprise Sunday night news of the resignations of Tom Davie and Deborah Turness. As I'm sure you are by now aware, this was occasioned by a clumsy edit in an old edition of Panorama, which has already been on the iplayer for a year. It's a non-story. Except people decided to make it a story. The reason I'd heard nothing of it until the resignations was that I'm not on X, where, apparently, it was all the media classes had been talking about for a week. It was an obsession of the unholy right-wing trifecta of the Mail, Telegraph and Times (who, given that they sent a bloke just last week to interview the wrong Bill di Blasio, you'd think would wind their necks in over factual inacccuracy). It was big news on GB news, all self-contain...

Creepy old men

I note, somewhat wearily, that creepy old men are back in the news, being creepy. Creepy old men, and their apologists and enablers, who argue that their creepiness is somehow the natural order of things. Old men would have you believe that it is difficult to not be a creepy old man. That it is a task of epic proportions. It is not that difficult. It is a matter of intention. As yet more of the grimness of Epstein unfolds, creepy old men are, sadly, a flaccid topic once again. Whether it be pursuing students thirty years their junior, or simply not asking too many questions about the background of the probably legal young woman who you've just been introduced to by your good pal Jeff. To be clear, I am not referring to criminal creepy old men, the ones who actually committed statutory rape, the ones who fucked trafficked hirls. That is not something which is allowed to get away merely with the contempt of the observer.  That deserves prison.  No , I'm referring to the hinterla...